National Security is More than Bombs

The focus of a previous Republican debate was national security. To a man (or woman) the only concern was for the security that comes from a bullet or battleship. Their strategies involved variations on sending our troops to die in Syria, greater involvement of the Arab nation’s troops, increased drone attacks and a strangely abundant call for carpet bombing.

Other kinds of security may come to mind on a national scale, food security is a biggie, and avoidance of floods and droughts, and disease vectors such as insect born infections, and epidemics, and heat waves and on and on from global warming and climate change. Bullets and battleships won’t help here, just the opposite. Instead of fighting we must work on agreeing so we can reach solutions.

Back to national security of the bombing kind. Last July the Department of Defense (DoD) released a report outlining possible threats to national security that could involve the military. “Global climate change will aggravate problems such as poverty, social tensions, environmental degradation, ineffectual leadership and weak political institutions that threaten stability in a number of countries…”

When the British exited the Indian subcontinent they partitioned the area into India and East and West Pakistan, based strictly on religious grounds. Later east Pakistan became Bangladesh. It is a small but populous, low-lying country. A predominantly Muslim country adjacent to a predominantly Hindu India. What happens when rising sea levels push 150 or so million Muslims “upslope” into Hindu India? The capital of Bangladesh is not coastal but still is just 4 meters above sea level. Even without forcing migration across borders, population concentration can cause strife.

Hardly any place on earth is immune from threats that could turn into military conflict. The melting of Arctic sea ice will bring several major nations into proximity in the area. Some of the area has ill-defined borders which when covered with ice weren’t much of an issue. Now those issues along with the seas are heating up.

Access to fresh water will surely become a flash point in the future. The high latitudes and low latitudes are predicted to get wetter, but the mid latitudes drier. There are already over a billion people with limited access to potable water and this may only get worse with global warming.

The DoD report emphasizes that the threat is real and requires planning to be prepared for the future. “The ability of the United States and other countries to cope with the risks and implications of climate change requires monitoring, analysis and integration of those risks into existing overall risk management measures, as appropriate for each combatant command, they added.”

A recurring theme in science fiction novels and movies has been the coming together of otherwise warring nations to fight a common enemy – space aliens. Will global warming be the threat not from space but from within which will bind us together as a world community? An important step was taken recently in Paris with a much heralded agreement among all nations. The meeting of world leaders has resulted in an international resolve to limit global warming to 2 degrees Celsius.

4 thoughts on “National Security is More than Bombs

  1. Bob Prickett

    Excellent post. Our permanent war economy is becoming an awful expensive distraction from our domestic dangers and needs. I saw hearings on Cspan dealing w/ what to do about the National Flood insurance program. It’s not often that I agree with privatization of govt programs but after hearing the case for having floods included in your normal homeowners policy it seemed like a great way to let the market price flood insurance – and perhaps result in more rational (less) coastal and flood prone area development. Point being, it is rare to hear an information rich discussion about something with as much potential impact as coastal and floodplain management not to mention how to pay for public water supplies etc. Meanwhile local news is about Tom Cole introducing legislation authorizing the use of the military including National guard against ISIS anywhere in the world.

    Reply
  2. Bill Tankersley

    Thanks for your research, analysis, and commentary. Unfortunately our predominate mentality operates on an ideology of the domination, might makes right attitude no different than the worst dictatorships or terrorists who want quick results to put fear into the hearts of those they want to dominate and control.

    Reply

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *